[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190328125646.872-12-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:56:45 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, mlxsw@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com
Subject: [patch net-next v4 11/12] nfp: do not handle nn->port defined case in nfp_net_get_phys_port_name()
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
If nn->port is defined it means that devlink_port has been registered
for this port as well. Devlink core is handling the port name
formatting.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
v1->v2:
- new patch
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
index b676943e54f4..99200b5dac76 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
@@ -3324,8 +3324,11 @@ nfp_net_get_phys_port_name(struct net_device *netdev, char *name, size_t len)
struct nfp_net *nn = netdev_priv(netdev);
int n;
+ /* If port is defined, devlink_port is registered and devlink core
+ * is taking care of name formatting.
+ */
if (nn->port)
- return nfp_port_get_phys_port_name(netdev, name, len);
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (nn->dp.is_vf || nn->vnic_no_name)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
2.17.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists