[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR21MB1337250A47CEE73D1EFE0AB7CA590@DM6PR21MB1337.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:00:18 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...uxonhyperv.com>
CC: "sashal@...nel.org" <sashal@...nel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>, vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH hyperv-fixes] hv_netvsc: Fix unwanted wakeup after
tx_disable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 2:38 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...uxonhyperv.com>
> Cc: sashal@...nel.org; linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Stephen
> Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; olaf@...fle.de; vkuznets
> <vkuznets@...hat.com>; davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH hyperv-fixes] hv_netvsc: Fix unwanted wakeup after
> tx_disable
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:48:45 +0000
> Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...uxonhyperv.com> wrote:
>
> > +static inline void netvsc_tx_enable(struct netvsc_device *nvscdev,
> > + struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + nvscdev->tx_disable = false;
> > + mb(); /* ensure queue wake up mechanism is on */
> > +
> > + netif_tx_wake_all_queues(ndev);
> > +}
>
> You don't need a full mb(). virt_wmb() should be sufficient.
I will make this change.
> Could I suggest an alternative approach.
> You don't need to introduce a local tx_disable flag, the only place where a
> wakeup could cause problems is after a send_completion was processed
> during detach state.
>
> Instead, just avoid wakeup in that place.
In netvsc_detach(), after netif_tx_disable(), we call netvsc_wait_until_empty(nvdev);
TX patch should not be waken up again while waiting for in/out ring to becomes empty.
In my tests before this patch, there are wakeup happens before netif_device_detach(),
so netif_device_present(ndev) is still true at that time.
In other places, like netvsc_close(), link_change(), we also don't want wakeup after tx_disable.
Thanks.
- Haiyang
>
> --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> @@ -720,6 +720,7 @@ static void netvsc_send_tx_complete(struct
> net_device *ndev,
> struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(ndev, q_idx);
>
> if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) &&
> + netif_device_present(ndev) &&
> (hv_get_avail_to_write_percent(&channel->outbound) >
> RING_AVAIL_PERCENT_HIWATER || queue_sends < 1)) {
> netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists