| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f9a71d46cb741e49e8ef759dffe72547805c4ef0.1553821057.git.rdna@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 18:01:57 -0700
From: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>, <ast@...nel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Support variable offset stack access from helpers
Currently there is a difference in how verifier checks memory access for
helper arguments for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE and PTR_TO_STACK with regard to
variable part of offset.
check_map_access, that is used for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, can handle variable
offsets just fine, so that BPF program can call a helper like this:
some_helper(map_value_ptr + off, size);
, where offset is unknown at load time, but is checked by program to be
in a safe rage (off >= 0 && off + size < map_value_size).
But it's not the case for check_stack_boundary, that is used for
PTR_TO_STACK, and same code with pointer to stack is rejected by
verifier:
some_helper(stack_value_ptr + off, size);
For example:
0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = 0
1: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0
2: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
3: (57) r2 &= 4
4: (17) r2 -= 16
5: (0f) r2 += r10
6: (18) r1 = 0xffff888111343a80
8: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
invalid variable stack read R2 var_off=(0xfffffffffffffff0; 0x4)
Add support for variable offset access to check_stack_boundary so that
if offset is checked by program to be in a safe range it's accepted by
verifier.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7c88099c4547..b7a7a9caa82f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2157,6 +2157,29 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_ins
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
}
+static int __check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
+ int off, int access_size,
+ bool zero_size_allowed)
+{
+ struct bpf_reg_state *reg = reg_state(env, regno);
+
+ if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK || off + access_size > 0 ||
+ access_size < 0 || (access_size == 0 && !zero_size_allowed)) {
+ if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
+ verbose(env, "invalid stack type R%d off=%d access_size=%d\n",
+ regno, off, access_size);
+ } else {
+ char tn_buf[48];
+
+ tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
+ verbose(env, "invalid stack type R%d var_off=%s access_size=%d\n",
+ regno, tn_buf, access_size);
+ }
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* when register 'regno' is passed into function that will read 'access_size'
* bytes from that pointer, make sure that it's within stack boundary
* and all elements of stack are initialized.
@@ -2169,7 +2192,7 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
{
struct bpf_reg_state *reg = reg_state(env, regno);
struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
- int off, i, slot, spi;
+ int err, min_off, max_off, i, slot, spi;
if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
/* Allow zero-byte read from NULL, regardless of pointer type */
@@ -2183,21 +2206,23 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
return -EACCES;
}
- /* Only allow fixed-offset stack reads */
- if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
- char tn_buf[48];
-
- tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
- verbose(env, "invalid variable stack read R%d var_off=%s\n",
- regno, tn_buf);
- return -EACCES;
- }
- off = reg->off + reg->var_off.value;
- if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK || off + access_size > 0 ||
- access_size < 0 || (access_size == 0 && !zero_size_allowed)) {
- verbose(env, "invalid stack type R%d off=%d access_size=%d\n",
- regno, off, access_size);
- return -EACCES;
+ if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
+ min_off = max_off = reg->var_off.value + reg->off;
+ err = __check_stack_boundary(env, regno, min_off, access_size,
+ zero_size_allowed);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ } else {
+ min_off = reg->smin_value + reg->off;
+ max_off = reg->umax_value + reg->off;
+ err = __check_stack_boundary(env, regno, min_off, access_size,
+ zero_size_allowed);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ err = __check_stack_boundary(env, regno, max_off, access_size,
+ zero_size_allowed);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
}
if (meta && meta->raw_mode) {
@@ -2206,10 +2231,10 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
return 0;
}
- for (i = 0; i < access_size; i++) {
+ for (i = min_off; i < max_off + access_size; i++) {
u8 *stype;
- slot = -(off + i) - 1;
+ slot = -i - 1;
spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE;
if (state->allocated_stack <= slot)
goto err;
@@ -2222,8 +2247,16 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
goto mark;
}
err:
- verbose(env, "invalid indirect read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n",
- off, i, access_size);
+ if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
+ verbose(env, "invalid indirect read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n",
+ min_off, i - min_off, access_size);
+ } else {
+ char tn_buf[48];
+
+ tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
+ verbose(env, "invalid indirect read from stack var_off %s+%d size %d\n",
+ tn_buf, i - min_off, access_size);
+ }
return -EACCES;
mark:
/* reading any byte out of 8-byte 'spill_slot' will cause
@@ -2232,7 +2265,7 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
mark_reg_read(env, &state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr,
state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.parent);
}
- return update_stack_depth(env, state, off);
+ return update_stack_depth(env, state, min_off);
}
static int check_helper_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists