netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2 net-next] cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour and use struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a835d790-874b-1fdb-2497-2e5ebf5725eb@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:36:05 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     vishal@...lsio.com, nhorman@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 net-next] cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour and use
 struct_size() helper



On 4/1/19 5:02 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:26:16 -0500
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patchset aims to fix an undefined behaviour when using a zero-sized
>> array and, add the use of the struct_size() helper in kvzalloc().
>>
>> You might consider the first patch in this series for stable.
>>
>> More details in the commit logs.
> 
> Series applied, honestly I don't think this is -stable material.
> 

Okay.

> And if it was you should have targetted 'net' instead of 'net-next'.
> 

Got it.

Thanks, Dave.
--
Gustavo