lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:14:24 -0300 From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> To: Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk> Cc: "jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>, "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...lanox.com> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/1] net: sched: Introduce conntrack action Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:45:06PM +0000, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > Hi Cong, > > OK, so I've renamed conndscp to conntrack and hopefully this are > flexible enough for future conntrack->skb operations to be added in the > future. How does this one fly? This work sort of clashes with the work that Paul Blakey and I are doing to integrate conntrack with tc and vice-versa. Considering that in this patch the action is not RCU-ified, that it is using a struct as netlink parameter and it is dealing only with the dscp info, seems it's easier if we/you extend our code to support this feature as well. How does that sound to you? The RFC I had posted is VERY outdated (message-id cover.1548285996.git.mleitner@...hat.com), please don't use it as reference. Not sure if Paul can post a refreshed RFC already. Thanks, Marcelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists