[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190401131423.GB13514@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:14:24 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk>
Cc: "jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/1] net: sched: Introduce conntrack action
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:45:06PM +0000, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> Hi Cong,
>
> OK, so I've renamed conndscp to conntrack and hopefully this are
> flexible enough for future conntrack->skb operations to be added in the
> future. How does this one fly?
This work sort of clashes with the work that Paul Blakey and I are
doing to integrate conntrack with tc and vice-versa.
Considering that in this patch the action is not RCU-ified, that it is
using a struct as netlink parameter and it is dealing only with the
dscp info, seems it's easier if we/you extend our code to support this
feature as well. How does that sound to you?
The RFC I had posted is VERY outdated (message-id
cover.1548285996.git.mleitner@...hat.com), please don't use it as
reference. Not sure if Paul can post a refreshed RFC already.
Thanks,
Marcelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists