[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28875329-5777-f097-d627-7d1c8eafa475@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:59:50 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"idosch@...lanox.com" <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/5] net: More movement to fib_nh_common
On 4/2/19 11:27 PM, Martin Lau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 02:11:53PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>>
>> Second set of three with the end goal of enabling IPv6 gateways with IPv4
>> routes.
> I am still not completely convinced on the new "*nhc" in patch 2 without
> seeing a patch showing why nh_sel is not enough.
fib_table_lookup and fib_select_path have determined the address of the
preferred fib_nh struct. To look it up again will get costly for nexthop
groups: dereference the nexthop pointer, see that it is a group, get the
pointer to the group data, find the Nth (nh_sel) entry and return it.
Since we already have the end pointer, avoid repeated lookups which
nh_sel requires and save the fib_nh to fib_result. That's what patch 2
is doing and the updated commit message shows that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists