[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190405211719.14979-14-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 14:17:17 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net-next V2 13/15] net/mlx5: A write memory barrier is sufficient in EQ ci update
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Soften the memory barrier call of mb() by a sufficient wmb() in the
consumer index update of the event queues.
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
index 46a747f7c162..e9837aeb7088 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ void mlx5_eq_update_ci(struct mlx5_eq *eq, u32 cc, bool arm)
__raw_writel((__force u32)cpu_to_be32(val), addr);
/* We still want ordering, just not swabbing, so add a barrier */
- mb();
+ wmb();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mlx5_eq_update_ci);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists