[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190405095758.3dba71df@jimi>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:59:51 +0300
From: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, antony@...nome.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ip xfrm: support setting/printing
XFRMA_IF_ID attribute in states/policies
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:13:36 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:07:38 +0300
> Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > The XFRMA_IF_ID attribute is set in policies/states for them to be
> > associated with an XFRM interface (4.19+).
> >
> > Add support for setting / displaying this attribute.
> >
> > Note that 0 is a valid value therefore set XFRMA_IF_ID if any value
> > was provided in command line.
> >
> > Tested-by: Antony Antony <antony@...nome.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
> > ---
>
> Since this works with existing kernel int should not need to wait for
> next.
Oh, sorry about that.
The patch applies cleanly and works on the iproute2 tree. Should I
resubmit?
Thanks!
Eyal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists