lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b32ed160-6c7f-fb8e-aa14-11d935a1cb15@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:04:20 +0800
From:   linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>, <shrijeet@...il.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v3] net: vrf: Fix ping failed when vrf mtu is set to 0

From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>

When the mtu of a vrf device is set to 0, it would cause ping
failed. So I think we should limit vrf mtu in a reasonable range
to solve this problem. I set dev->min_mtu to IPV6_MIN_MTU, so it
will works for both ipv4 and ipv6. And if dev->max_mtu still be 0
can be confusing, so I set dev->max_mtu to ETH_MAX_MTU.

Here is the reproduce step:

1.Config vrf interface and set mtu to 0:
3: enp4s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
master vrf1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 52:54:00:9e:dd:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

2.Ping peer:
3: enp4s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
master vrf1 state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 52:54:00:9e:dd:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.0.0.1/16 scope global enp4s0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
connect: Network is unreachable

3.Set mtu to default value, ping works:
PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.88 ms

Fixes: ad49bc6361ca2 ("net: vrf: remove MTU limits for vrf device")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
V2->V3:
- delete VRF specific mtu macros
- set mtu range directly and add a comment

 drivers/net/vrf.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
index 6d1a1abbed27..cd15c32b2e43 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
@@ -1275,8 +1275,12 @@ static void vrf_setup(struct net_device *dev)
 	dev->priv_flags |= IFF_NO_QUEUE;
 	dev->priv_flags |= IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER;

-	dev->min_mtu = 0;
-	dev->max_mtu = 0;
+	/* VRF devices do not care about MTU, but if the MTU is set
+	 * too low then the ipv4 and ipv6 protocols are disabled
+	 * which breaks networking.
+	 */
+	dev->min_mtu = IPV6_MIN_MTU;
+	dev->max_mtu = ETH_MAX_MTU;
 }

 static int vrf_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[],
-- 
2.19.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ