netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests: bpf: add VRF test cases to lwt_ip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:57:31 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Oskolkov <posk@...k.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests: bpf: add VRF test cases to
 lwt_ip_encap test.

On 4/9/19 2:48 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 04/05/2019 04:32 AM, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 4/3/19 9:43 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>>> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
>>> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh        | 134 +++++++++++-------
>>>  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> I hit a wall with running this script. One problem is the different
>> versions of nc for debian (stretch to be specific), and another problem
>> is commands failing it is hard to figure out why (e.g., connect failures
>> which seem like route lookup problems). I have been adding run_cmd and
>> PAUSE_ON_FAIL options similar to what is in fib_tests.sh and the change
>> I sent for pmtu.sh, but I have not finished.
>>
>> I am traveling tomorrow and not sure how much time I'll get this weekend
>> to come back to this. Might be early next week.
> 
> Hi David, any progress on the above?

not yet.