netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190409182500.ezvhvgfrcbdvhd6o@kafai-mbp>
Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 18:25:02 +0000
From:   Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: support input __sk_buff context in
 BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:27:37AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN:
> * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context
> * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context
> 
> The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that
> operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC).
> 
> For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and
> output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into
> skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL).
> If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified
> __sk_buff back to the userspace.
> 
> We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly
> support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might
> add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user
> runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them.
> 
> The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff
> to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use
> this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for
> example).
> 
> v3:
>   * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin]
>   * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr
>     checks [Martin]
> 
> v2:
>   * Addressed comments from Martin Lau
> 
> Cc: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   7 ++
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c     |  10 ++-
>  net/bpf/test_run.c       | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 837024512baf..8e96f99cebf8 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -396,6 +396,13 @@ union bpf_attr {
>  		__aligned_u64	data_out;
>  		__u32		repeat;
>  		__u32		duration;
> +		__u32		ctx_size_in;	/* input: len of ctx_in */
> +		__u32		ctx_size_out;	/* input/output: len of ctx_out
> +						 *   returns ENOSPC if ctx_out
> +						 *   is too small.
> +						 */
> +		__aligned_u64	ctx_in;
> +		__aligned_u64	ctx_out;
>  	} test;
>  
>  	struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_*_GET_*_ID */
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 1d65e56594db..5bb963e8f9b0 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -1949,7 +1949,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
>  	return cgroup_bpf_prog_query(attr, uattr);
>  }
>  
> -#define BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN_LAST_FIELD test.duration
> +#define BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN_LAST_FIELD test.ctx_out
>  
>  static int bpf_prog_test_run(const union bpf_attr *attr,
>  			     union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> @@ -1962,6 +1962,14 @@ static int bpf_prog_test_run(const union bpf_attr *attr,
>  	if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if ((attr->test.ctx_size_in && !attr->test.ctx_in) ||
> +	    (!attr->test.ctx_size_in && attr->test.ctx_in))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if ((attr->test.ctx_size_out && !attr->test.ctx_out) ||
> +	    (!attr->test.ctx_size_out && attr->test.ctx_out))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->test.prog_fd);
>  	if (IS_ERR(prog))
>  		return PTR_ERR(prog);
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index fab142b796ef..2023d8841c6d 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -123,12 +123,125 @@ static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 size,
>  	return data;
>  }
>  
> +static void *bpf_ctx_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 max_size)
> +{
> +	void __user *data_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.ctx_in);
> +	void __user *data_out = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.ctx_out);
> +	u32 size = kattr->test.ctx_size_in;
> +	void *data;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!data_in && !data_out)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	data = kzalloc(max_size, GFP_USER);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	if (data_in) {
> +		err = bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(data_in, max_size, size);
> +		if (err) {
> +			kfree(data);
> +			return ERR_PTR(err);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (copy_from_user(data, data_in, size)) {
A min_t is needed:
		size = min_t(u32, max_size, size);
		if (copy_from_user(data, data_in, size)) {

Others lgtm,

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>

> +			kfree(data);
> +			return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return data;
> +}