[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190409090643.0d8ce19a@xps13>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:06:43 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Prevent suspend to RAM
Hi Pavel,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote on Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:55:41 +0200:
> On Tue 2019-02-05 12:07:28, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > On one hand, the mv88e6xxx driver has a work queue called in loop
> > which will attempt register accesses after MDIO bus suspension, that
> > entirely freezes the platform during suspend.
> >
> > On the other hand, the DSA core is not ready yet to support suspend to
> > RAM operation because so far there is no way to recover reliably the
> > switch configuration.
> >
> > To avoid the kernel to freeze when suspending with a switch driven by
> > the mv88e6xxx driver, we choose to prevent the driver suspension and
> > in the same way, the whole platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
>
> Could we at least do printk() so that user knows what went wrong?
>
> Debugging s2ram is usually not easy :-(.
I suppose you will be told that suspend was refused by a driver
(probably without stating which one though). You may send a patch to add
a trace if you think it is important, as this change as already been
merged.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists