netdev - Re: [PATCH 07/12] arm64: dts: allwinner: orange-pi-3: Enable ethernet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYGdLEeX8aBJfPQg=8OHcQR_uTJoA1FaO5p1od+VX2Nzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:35:02 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
        Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
        Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
        Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com>,
        Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Naveen Gupta <naveen.gupta@...ress.com>,
        "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
        brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] arm64: dts: allwinner: orange-pi-3: Enable ethernet

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:22 AM Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com> wrote:

> > > +                enable-active-high;
> > > +                gpio = <&pio 3 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PD6 */
> >
> > Is enable-active-high still needed? It's redundant with the
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH flag.
>
> Looking at the code, use/non-use of enable-active-high inhibits
> flags specified in gpio property. So the GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH flag
> is ignored here (had GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW been used, the kernel would
> ignore it too and print a warning).
>
> So enable-active-high is still necessary here.
>
> See comment in gpiolib-of.c where this is handled:
>
> /*
>  * The regulator GPIO handles are specified such that the
>  * presence or absence of "enable-active-high" solely controls
>  * the polarity of the GPIO line. Any phandle flags must
>  * be actively ignored.
>  */

Yeah this caused me special headache in the current merge
window because of buggy code on my part.

This is an effect of this flag being defined for powerpc
ages before we properly implemented generic GPIO
bindings. We just have to respect it.

See:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=155417774822532&w=2

Yours,
Linus Walleij