[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1506fcbbfb7ab7a1e448b7b6cbf45f703bfcc80f.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:01:46 +0300
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tun congestion/BQL
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 15:01 +0300, David Woodhouse wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1125,7 +1128,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff
> *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> if (tfile->flags & TUN_FASYNC)
> kill_fasync(&tfile->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
> tfile->socket.sk->sk_data_ready(tfile->socket.sk);
>
> + if (!ptr_ring_empty(&tfile->tx_ring))
> + netif_stop_queue(tun->dev);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>
>
Hm, that should be using ptr_ring_full() shouldn't it? So...
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1121,6 +1121,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct s
if (ptr_ring_produce(&tfile->tx_ring, skb))
goto drop;
+ if (ptr_ring_full(&tfile->tx_ring))
+ netif_stop_queue(tun->dev);
+
/* Notify and wake up reader process */
if (tfile->flags & TUN_FASYNC)
kill_fasync(&tfile->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
@@ -2229,6 +2232,7 @@ static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_st
consume_skb(skb);
}
+ netif_wake_queue(tun->dev);
return ret;
}
That doesn't seem to make much difference at all; it's still dropping a
lot of packets because ptr_ring_produce() is returning non-zero.
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
212992 1400 10.00 7747169 0 8676.81
212992 10.00 1471769 1648.38
Making it call netif_stop_queue() when ptr_ring_produce() fails causes
it to perform even worse...
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
212992 1400 10.00 1906235 0 2134.98
212992 10.00 985428 1103.68
At this point I'm mostly just confused.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5174 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists