[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190410134923.35100-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:49:23 +0800
From: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <paul.burton@...s.com>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, <jhogan@...nel.org>,
<ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kafai@...com>,
<songliubraving@...com>, <yhs@...com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] MIPS: eBPF: Make ebpf_to_mips_reg() static
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Fix sparse warning:
arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c:196:5: warning:
symbol 'ebpf_to_mips_reg' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
index 3548a69..dfd5a4b 100644
--- a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
@@ -193,8 +193,9 @@ enum which_ebpf_reg {
* separate frame pointer, so BPF_REG_10 relative accesses are
* adjusted to be $sp relative.
*/
-int ebpf_to_mips_reg(struct jit_ctx *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn,
- enum which_ebpf_reg w)
+static int ebpf_to_mips_reg(struct jit_ctx *ctx,
+ const struct bpf_insn *insn,
+ enum which_ebpf_reg w)
{
int ebpf_reg = (w == src_reg || w == src_reg_no_fp) ?
insn->src_reg : insn->dst_reg;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists