lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7Gbrsh0WKPWB1GPue_gKFnuT-byoSYYx3-qXfcvpDPYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:35:45 -0700
From:   Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] bpf: cpumap memory prefetchw optimizations
 for struct page

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:02 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> A lot of the performance gain comes from this patch.
>
> While analysing performance overhead it was found that the largest CPU
> stalls were caused when touching the struct page area. It is first read with
> a READ_ONCE from build_skb_around via page_is_pfmemalloc(), and when freed
> written by page_frag_free() call.
>
> Measurements show that the prefetchw (W) variant operation is needed to
> achieve the performance gain. We believe this optimization it two fold,
> first the W-variant saves one step in the cache-coherency protocol, and
> second it helps us to avoid the non-temporal prefetch HW optimizations and
> bring this into all cache-levels. It might be worth investigating if
> prefetch into L2 will have the same benefit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>


> ---
>  kernel/bpf/cpumap.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
> index b82a11556ad5..4758482ab5b9 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,18 @@ static int cpu_map_kthread_run(void *data)
>                  * consume side valid as no-resize allowed of queue.
>                  */
>                 n = ptr_ring_consume_batched(rcpu->queue, frames, CPUMAP_BATCH);
> +
> +               for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +                       void *f = frames[i];
> +                       struct page *page = virt_to_page(f);
> +
> +                       /* Bring struct page memory area to curr CPU. Read by
> +                        * build_skb_around via page_is_pfmemalloc(), and when
> +                        * freed written by page_frag_free call.
> +                        */
> +                       prefetchw(page);
> +               }
> +
>                 m = kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(skbuff_head_cache, gfp, n, skbs);
>                 if (unlikely(m == 0)) {
>                         for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ