[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190411173930.51fec773@carbon>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:39:30 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] net: core: introduce build_skb_around
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:34:29 -0700
Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com> wrote:
> > +struct sk_buff *build_skb_around(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + void *data, unsigned int frag_size)
> > +{
> > + if (unlikely(!skb))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + skb = __build_skb_around(skb, data, frag_size);
>
>
> > +
> > + if (skb && frag_size) {
> > + skb->head_frag = 1;
> > + if (page_is_pfmemalloc(virt_to_head_page(data)))
> > + skb->pfmemalloc = 1;
> > + }
>
> I didn't find any explanation of this part (head_frag, pfmemalloc).
> Shall we split it out to a separate patch?
No, it belongs here. This is like/based on the __build_skb() and
build_skb() split, and needed such that __build_skb() can reuse the
code in __build_skb_around().
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists