netdev - Re: [crypto 0/4] Inline TLS client and v6 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:40:10 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Atul Gupta <atul.gupta@...lsio.com>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dt@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [crypto 0/4] Inline TLS client and v6 support

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:47:09 +0530, Atul Gupta wrote:
> On 4/10/2019 9:28 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:56:37 +0530, Atul Gupta wrote:  
> >> On 4/9/2019 11:31 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> >>> On Tue,  9 Apr 2019 08:22:34 -0700, Atul Gupta wrote:    
> >>>> Extends Inline TLS record processing to TLS client. connect
> >>>> API is added to tls_context to setup hardware for TLS
> >>>> connection and handshake. Functionality wise, this makes the solution
> >>>> end-to-end Inline TLS capable. TLS server and client
> >>>> can operate in Inline mode and leverage hardware for complete
> >>>> TLS record offload.
> >>>> [0004] Adds the IPv6 support for Inline TLS server/client.
> >>>>
> >>>> RFC series for this patch was created against net-next and 
> >>>> submitted on 18 Jan'2019.
> >>>> This series is created against Herbert branch.    
> >>> Sorry if someone already asked this, but is your HW doing full ToE 
> >>> for all this TLS "record offload" stuff?    
> >> Yes Jakub  
> > So from what I grok you already feed all the data directly to the
> > socket completely bypassing the lower layers of the networking stack,
> > and with this patch set you'd also move 3WHS into the FW?  
> Yes, that's correct.

I believe then it's a no-go from netdev perspective.