[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190411164703.GA5716@kevinolos>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:47:04 -0600
From: Kevin Locke <kevin@...inlocke.name>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool: Add bash-completion script
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 09:14 -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 20:19:37 -0600 Kevin Locke <kevin@...inlocke.name> wrote:
>> To aid users constructing a valid ethtool invocation, create a
>> [bash-completion] script to provide [programmable completion] of ethtool
>> arguments. It supports all current command options.
>>
>> The script is placed in shell-completion/bash and installed to
>> completionsdir from pkg-config for bash-completion, similar to [kmod].
>> It requires pkg-config 0.18 or later to be installed on the build
>> system which runs aclocal (for the PKG_CHECK_MODULES m4 macro).
>>
>> [...]
>
> Thank you! I think this is super useful, and I agree FWIW that it
> should be part of ethtool. I suspect that it needs to be installed by
> any package manager as part of ethtool install, into the right
> directory. Could be a followup patch?
Great! Glad to hear it. Patched configure.ac and Makefile.am install
the script to `pkg-config --variable=completionsdir bash-completion`
(with fallback to $datadir/bash-completion/completions) by default.
It can be disabled by passing --without-bash-completion-dir or
overridden by --with-bash-completion-dir=$anypath. I would expect
most distribution packages would install it by default, but if there
are followup patches (for ethtool or to the distributions), I'd be
happy to submit those as well.
> And the only (minor) complaint I have about your patch is that the
> commit message doesn't show how to install it (basically just copy
> ethtool file from this patch to
> f.e. /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/)
Good point. I will document the install process and the configure
arguments mentioned above and send an updated patch shortly.
> I did a quick touch test of it and it seemed to be completing ethtool
> commands which made me really happy, especially the network interface
> names which are so long.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
>
> And now I'm going to go and tell everyone I work with about this
> patch. :-)
Wonderful! I'm very glad to hear that you found it useful and I hope
your colleagues appreciate it as well. Let me know if you or they
find any improvements that I can include in a future version of the
patch.
Thanks for taking the time to review it!
Best,
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists