[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ae7a9ae-1d07-afaf-c31f-1c46f48df9f2@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:52:55 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix missing bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero in
BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN
On 04/11/2019 06:12 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Commit b0b9395d865e ("bpf: support input __sk_buff context in
> BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN") started using bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero in
> BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN. However, bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero is not defined
> for !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL:
>
> net/bpf/test_run.c: In function ‘bpf_ctx_init’:
> net/bpf/test_run.c:142:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> err = bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(data_in, max_size, size);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Let's not build net/bpf/test_run.c when CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is not set.
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Fixes: b0b9395d865e ("bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN")
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Makes sense, applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists