[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190410201913.44dbf536@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:19:13 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 bpf-next 11/19] libbpf: new global variable
"libbpf_test_mode"
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:50:25 +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
> Enable BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 for all existing bpf selftests or other
> independent tests could involve quite a few changes to make sure all bpf
> prog load places has BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 set.
>
> Given most of the tests are using libbpf, this patch introduces a new
> global variable "libbpf_test_mode" into libbpf, once which is set, all bpf
> prog load issued through libbpf will have BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 set
> automatically, this could minimize changes required from testsuite.
>
> The other way might be introducing new load function like
> "bpf_prog_test_load", which will set BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32. But there are
> several prog load APIs, and we need minor changes on some parameters.
>
> The global variable approach seems to be a proper first step for easy
> testsuite porting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Can we perhaps make it per-object by setting it after
bpf_object__open() but before bpf_object__load(), or add
it to struct bpf_object_open_attr?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists