[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190412132855.GA21114@splinter>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:28:58 +0000
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"idosch@...sch.org" <idosch@...sch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sched: flower: fix filter net reference
counting
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:54:19AM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> Fix net reference counting in fl_change() and remove redundant call to
> tcf_exts_get_net() from __fl_delete(). __fl_put() already tries to get net
> before releasing exts and deallocating a filter, so this code caused flower
> classifier to obtain net twice per filter that is being deleted.
>
> Implementation of __fl_delete() called tcf_exts_get_net() to pass its
> result as 'async' flag to fl_mask_put(). However, 'async' flag is redundant
> and only complicates fl_mask_put() implementation. This functionality seems
> to be copied from filter cleanup code, where it was added by Cong with
> following explanation:
>
> This patchset tries to fix the race between call_rcu() and
> cleanup_net() again. Without holding the netns refcnt the
> tc_action_net_exit() in netns workqueue could be called before
> filter destroy works in tc filter workqueue. This patchset
> moves the netns refcnt from tc actions to tcf_exts, without
> breaking per-netns tc actions.
>
> This doesn't apply to flower mask, which doesn't call any tc action code
> during cleanup. Simplify fl_mask_put() by removing the flag parameter and
> always use tcf_queue_work() to free mask objects.
>
> Fixes: 061775583e35 ("net: sched: flower: introduce reference counting for filters")
> Fixes: 1f17f7742eeb ("net: sched: flower: insert filter to ht before offloading it to hw")
> Fixes: 05cd271fd61a ("cls_flower: Support multiple masks per priority")
> Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
I see the patch was already applied, but FWIW:
Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists