[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b2d7f91-7d1d-f3ec-bee3-1da7a98d5860@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:26:18 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tun congestion/BQL
On 2019/4/11 下午5:25, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 15:22 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> If you care about userspace performance, you may want to try vhost + TAP
>> instead. I admit the API is not user friendly which needs to be improved
>> but then there will be no syscall overhead on packet transmission and
>> receiving, and eventfd will be used for notification.
> That would be very useful. Is there any example code I can follow?
>
Yes, you can refer:
1) Qemu hw/virtio/vhost.c or hw/net/vhost_net.c
2) dpdk drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel_tap.c
DPDK code seems more compact.
Basically, the setup of TUN/TAP should be the same, then userspace need
to allocate virtio rings and pass them and tap fd to vhost through
vhost_net ioctls.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists