[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5582535-a3cb-30ce-bbda-761720490663@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:07:54 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, taketarou2@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix missing meta data in skb with vlan packet
On 2019/04/15 16:43, Yuya Kusakabe wrote:
...
> > @@ -5095,6 +5096,13 @@ static struct sk_buff
> > *skb_reorder_vlan_header(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > memmove(skb_mac_header(skb) + VLAN_HLEN,
> skb_mac_header(skb),
> > mac_len - VLAN_HLEN - ETH_TLEN);
> > }
> > +
> > + meta_len = skb_metadata_len(skb);
> > + if (meta_len) {
>
> Since this is not used by non-XDP skb and skb path is slow-path for XDP
> anyway, should add unlikely here in favor of non-XDP case?
>
>
> I referred to meta data support of the ixgbe driver. It doesn't use
> "unlikely".
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c#n2176
No need to conform to existing logic when we can improve it...
Anyway this is a minor point and I'm OK with either.
Reviewed-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
--
Toshiaki Makita
Powered by blists - more mailing lists