lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:28:30 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Guy Harris <guy@...m.mit.edu>
Cc:     Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>, openbsc@...ts.osmocom.org,
        radiotap@...bsd.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>,
        Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
        Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sean Tranchetti <stranche@...eaurora.org>,
        Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@...ksander.es>
Subject: Re: gsmtap design/extensions?

On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 12:48 -0700, Guy Harris wrote:

> I.e., there's a split there between "capture" and "getting the packets
> from a capture delivered to you over an IP network".

Right. That's what I was trying to get at, you said it much more
succinctly.

> Depending on how your system is set up:
> 
> 	$ ls -l /dev/bpf*
> 	crw-rw----  1 root  access_bpf   23,   0 Apr 10 22:57 /dev/bpf0
> 	crw-rw----  1 root  access_bpf   23,   1 Apr 10 22:56 /dev/bpf1
> 
> 		...
> 
> and it could just be rw-rw-rw-.  Perhaps other systems make it harder
> to grant capture privileges.

Yeah, generally it's not that *hard*. It still seems *wrong*, and e.g.
it would also mean if you do need to do it remotely you'd have to filter
out your own remote control (ssh) traffic lest you cause traffic
amplification, etc.

johannes

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ