lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:32:09 +0000
From:   Preethi Ramachandra <preethir@...iper.net>
To:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Silambu Chelvan M <silambu@...iper.net>,
        Yogesh Ankolekar <ayogesh@...iper.net>
Subject: Query regarding IPV6 multipath (ECMP) routes in Linux 

Hi,

I want to understand the IPV4 and IPV6 multipath(ECMP) routes behaviour in Linux. 

I tried configuring IPV4 and IPV6 multipath routes on Linux using ip route add command. Linux versions used in this testing are 
 1. Linux Kernel: 3.14.52-rt50-WR7.0.0.9_ovp
 2. Linux Kernel: 4.8.28-WR2.2.1_standard

IPV4 multipath route addition and display:
ip route add 1.1.1.0/24 nexthop via 192.168.1.254 nexthop via 192.168.0.254

ip route show 
1.1.1.0/24
        nexthop via 192.168.1.254  dev virbr0 weight 1
        nexthop via 192.168.0.254  dev eth0 weight 1

IPV6 multipath route addition and display:
ip route add 2001:d98:0:e101::1/128  nexthop via 3100:db8:c70:a20:c2bf:a7ff:fed2:1111 nexthop via 2102:db8:c70:a20::2

ip -6 route show
2001:d98:0:e101::1 via 3100:db8:c70:a20:c2bf:a7ff:fed2:1111 dev eth0  metric 1024
2001:d98:0:e101::1 via 2102:db8:c70:a20::2 dev eth0  metric 1024

In IPV4 a single route is added with multipath nexthops. However, in IPV6 , multipath routes are added as separate single routes with each multipath NH. I wanted to understand why is this behaviour change in Linux for IPV6 multipath routes. Why wasn’t same IPV4 approach followed in this case?

The code path to add IPV6 multipath routes is 

inet6_rtm_newroute()
  rtm_to_fib6_config()
  ip6_route_multipath_add()
    	list_for_each_entry(nh, &rt6_nh_list, next) {
		err = __ip6_ins_rt(nh->rt6_info, &cfg->fc_nlinfo, &nh->mxc);
		/* nh->rt6_info is used or freed at this point, reset to NULL*/
		nh->rt6_info = NULL;
		if (err) {
			if (replace && nhn)
				ip6_print_replace_route_err(&rt6_nh_list);
			err_nh = nh;
			goto add_errout;
		}

		/* Because each route is added like a single route we remove
		 * these flags after the first nexthop: if there is a collision,
		 * we have already failed to add the first nexthop:
		 * fib6_add_rt2node() has rejected it; when replacing, old
		 * nexthops have been replaced by first new, the rest should
		 * be added to it.
		 */
		cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh->nlmsg_flags &= ~(NLM_F_EXCL |                    <<<< This flag is unset here to allow duplicate routes in fib6_add_rt2node() function.
						     NLM_F_REPLACE);
		nhn++;
	}
	

Thanks,
Preethi










Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ