[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6641fe7a-b1a2-bd2d-9c4e-7dbc00fec015@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:52:42 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: mark expected switch fall-through
On 4/16/19 2:17 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 15/04/2019 23:11, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>
>> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c: In function ‘netback_changed’:
>> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c:2038:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
>> ^
>> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c:2041:2: note: here
>> case XenbusStateClosing:
>> ^~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
>> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>
Thanks, Juergen.
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists