[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4c1a3ca0c0c160b7c271ab83deebcf096f38497.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:39:56 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mac80211: set NETIF_F_LLTX when using intermediate
tx queues
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 17:37 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 10:33 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is true because we have an entire buffering layer in mac80211 (in
> > > > this case at least) and never push back to the stack.
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if we should be?
> >
> > I don't think so? We'd just buffer packets in yet another place.
>
> But you do realise that you're giving up on the rich queueing
> functionality that Linux provides (net/sched),
Yes, that was a trade-off we always knew about. The model that Linux
provides is just not suited for wifi.
> not to mention
> breaking certain applications that rely on congestion feedback?
This I don't understand. The congestion feedback happens through socket
buffer space etc. which is still there (as long as nobody sneaks in an
skb_orphan() call)
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists