lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:46:17 +0200
From:   Björn Töpel <>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <>
Cc:     Björn Töpel <>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <>,
        "Karlsson, Magnus" <>,, Jason Wang <>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <>,
        Daniel Borkmann <>,
        Jakub Kicinski <>,
        John Fastabend <>,
        David Miller <>,
        Andy Gospodarek <>,
        "" <>,
        bpf <>, Thomas Graf <>,
        Thomas Monjalon <>,
        Jonathan Lemon <>
Subject: Re: Per-queue XDP programs, thoughts

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 18:33, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, please convince me! :-D
> I tried to above...

I think you (and Jakub) did. :-) Looks like a "queue" is a good
(necessary) abstraction, but I need to think more about how to e.g.
access "dedicated/isolated" AF_XDP queues or XDP Tx queues in a
convenient way.

I'll still aiming for making it dead-easy (like Jonathan describes) to
use AF_XDP sockets...

Thanks a lot for all the input/help!


Powered by blists - more mailing lists