[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNisQRdsjqWoyODAkOq142NtXAV3=0wLuDQGkQpu3Sp+OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:46:17 +0200
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@...jalon.net>,
Jonathan Lemon <bsd@...com>
Subject: Re: Per-queue XDP programs, thoughts
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 18:33, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
[...]
> >
> > Ok, please convince me! :-D
>
> I tried to above...
>
I think you (and Jakub) did. :-) Looks like a "queue" is a good
(necessary) abstraction, but I need to think more about how to e.g.
access "dedicated/isolated" AF_XDP queues or XDP Tx queues in a
convenient way.
I'll still aiming for making it dead-easy (like Jonathan describes) to
use AF_XDP sockets...
Thanks a lot for all the input/help!
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists