lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:14:06 +0300
From:   Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
To:     Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, johannes.berg@...el.com,
        emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com, linuxwifi@...el.com,
        kvalo@...eaurora.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Use correct channel_profile iniwl_get_nvm

On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 11:24 +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> 
> commit 2785ce008e3b ("iwlwifi: support new NVM response API")
> seems forgot use correct channel_profile in iwl_get_nvm when call
> iwl_init_sbands().
> 
> Fixes: 2785ce008e3b ("iwlwifi: support new NVM response API")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c
> index 40985dc..d87a6bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c
> @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ struct iwl_nvm_data *iwl_get_nvm(struct
> iwl_trans *trans,
>  			  (void *)rsp_v3->regulatory.channel_profile;
>  
>  	iwl_init_sbands(trans->dev, trans->cfg, nvm,
> -			rsp->regulatory.channel_profile,
> +			channel_profile,
>  			nvm->valid_tx_ant & fw->valid_tx_ant,
>  			nvm->valid_rx_ant & fw->valid_rx_ant,
>  			sbands_flags, v4);

Thanks!

This was a rebase damage I made when sending this upstream.  I've
applied this directly to our upstream feeding tree because it's not
wrong in our internal tree.

--
Cheers,
Luca.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists