[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190418055759.GA3155@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 05:58:01 +0000
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Feras Daoud <ferasda@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 3/6] RDMA/ucontext: Do not allow BAR mappings to
be executable
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 07:05:37PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
> >diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
> >b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
> >index fef4519d1241..3ef6474cd201 100644
> >+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
> >@@ -889,6 +889,10 @@ static struct rdma_umap_priv
> >*rdma_user_mmap_pre(struct ib_ucontext *ucontext,
> > struct ib_uverbs_file *ufile = ucontext->ufile;
> > struct rdma_umap_priv *priv;
> >
> >+ if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)
> >+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >+ vma->vm_flags &= ~VM_MAYEXEC;
> >+
>
> A change like this was made in HFI with:
>
> commit 12220267645cb7d1f3f699218e0098629e932e1f
> IB/hfi: Protect against writable mmap
>
> This caused user applications that use the stack for execution to fail.
> The VM_EXEC flag is passed down during mmaps.
>
> We had to remove this patch with:
>
> commit 7709b0dc265f28695487712c45f02bbd1f98415d
> IB/hfi1: Remove overly conservative VM_EXEC flag check
>
> to resolve this issue.
>
> I am not sure if this is an equivalent issue, but the code path
> appears very similar.
It does seem problematic here too
Kees: You have worked in this W^X area in other parts of the kernel,
what should drivers do here?
The situation is we have a driver providing mmap against BAR memory
that is absolutely not intended for execution, so we would prefer to
block VM_EXEC in the driver's mmap fops callback
However READ_IMPLIES_EXEC forces VM_EXEC on for everything with no way
to opt out..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists