netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 02/15] bpf: mark lo32 writes that should be zero extended into hi32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQJWqUy6==Kg_3t37-J5JFjmfRH-Fc85yz52mkgLnM2jxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 16:28:51 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 02/15] bpf: mark lo32 writes that should be
 zero extended into hi32

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 4:27 PM Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com> wrote:
>
> OK, will split REG_LIVE_READ into REG_LIVE_READ64 and REG_LIVE_READ32, and
> will let the prior override the latter early inside mark_reg_read. I feel
> renaming parameter for propagate_liveness (the "parent" etc) could be a
> following up patch? Let me know if you want it included in this set.

of course. renaming should be separate.