netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: add writable context for raw tracepoints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6fbd1336-d2a0-3ea8-6127-ffb12ddde365@fb.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Apr 2019 18:12:24 +0000
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Matt Mullins <mmullins@...com>, Andrew Hall <hall@...com>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: add writable context for raw
 tracepoints



On 4/19/19 2:04 PM, Matt Mullins wrote:
> This is an opt-in interface that allows a tracepoint to provide a safe
> buffer that can be written from a BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT program.
> The size of the buffer must be a compile-time constant, and is checked
> before allowing a BPF program to attach to a tracepoint that uses this
> feature.
> 
> The pointer to this buffer will be the first argument of tracepoints
> that opt in; the buffer is readable by both BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT
> and BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE programs that attach to such a
> tracepoint, but the buffer to which it points may only be written by the
> latter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Mullins <mmullins@...com>
> ---
>   include/linux/bpf.h             |  2 ++
>   include/linux/bpf_types.h       |  1 +
>   include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h |  1 +
>   include/trace/bpf_probe.h       | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h        |  1 +
>   kernel/bpf/syscall.c            |  8 ++++++--
>   kernel/bpf/verifier.c           | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c        | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   8 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index a2132e09dc1c..d3c71fd67476 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ enum bpf_reg_type {
>   	PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL, /* reg points to sock_common or NULL */
>   	PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK,	 /* reg points to struct tcp_sock */
>   	PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL, /* reg points to struct tcp_sock or NULL */
> +	PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER,	 /* reg points to a writable raw tp's buffer */
>   };
>   
[...]
>   /* truncate register to smaller size (in bytes)
>    * must be called with size < BPF_REG_SIZE
>    */
> @@ -2100,6 +2127,10 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
>   		err = check_sock_access(env, insn_idx, regno, off, size, t);
>   		if (!err && value_regno >= 0)
>   			mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
> +	} else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER) {
> +		err = check_tp_buffer_access(env, reg, regno, off, size);
> +		if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
> +			mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
>   	} else {
>   		verbose(env, "R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", regno,
>   			reg_type_str[reg->type]);
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index d64c00afceb5..a2dd79dc6871 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -909,6 +909,24 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops raw_tracepoint_verifier_ops = {
>   const struct bpf_prog_ops raw_tracepoint_prog_ops = {
>   };
>   
> +static bool raw_tp_writable_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
> +						 enum bpf_access_type type,
> +						 const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> +						 struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
> +{
> +	if (off == 0 && size == sizeof(u64))
> +		info->reg_type = PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER;

on 32bit system, the first argument pointer size could be sizeof(u32)?
Should the first argument for raw_tp_writable_prog be always 
PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER?


> +	return raw_tp_prog_is_valid_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
> +}
> +
> +const struct bpf_verifier_ops raw_tracepoint_writable_verifier_ops = {
> +	.get_func_proto  = raw_tp_prog_func_proto,
> +	.is_valid_access = raw_tp_writable_prog_is_valid_access,
> +};
> +
> +const struct bpf_prog_ops raw_tracepoint_writable_prog_ops = {
> +};
> +
>   static bool pe_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
>   				    const struct bpf_prog *prog,
>   				    struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
> @@ -1198,6 +1216,9 @@ static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *
>   	if (prog->aux->max_ctx_offset > btp->num_args * sizeof(u64))
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> +	if (prog->aux->max_tp_access > btp->writable_size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>   	return tracepoint_probe_register(tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, prog);
>   }
>   
>