[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11809.1556057199@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:06:39 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] rxrpc: fix race condition in rxrpc_input_packet()
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> @@ -1161,19 +1161,15 @@ int rxrpc_extract_header(struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp, struct sk_buff *skb)
> * handle data received on the local endpoint
> * - may be called in interrupt context
> *
> - * The socket is locked by the caller and this prevents the socket from being
> - * shut down and the local endpoint from going away, thus sk_user_data will not
> - * be cleared until this function returns.
> - *
I'd prefer not to remove the comment entirely. Could it be changed to:
* [!] Note that as this is called from the encap_rcv hook, the socket is not
* held locked by the caller and nothing prevents sk_user_data on the UDP from
* being cleared in the middle of processing this function.
> @@ -1181,6 +1177,10 @@ int rxrpc_input_packet(struct sock *udp_sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> _enter("%p", udp_sk);
>
> + if (unlikely(!local)) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return 0;
> + }
This looks better, thanks.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists