lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:28:56 +0200
From:   Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 61/98] libceph: fix breakage caused by
 multipage bvecs

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 9:44 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 187df76325af5d9e12ae9daec1510307797e54f0 ]
>
> A bvec can now consist of multiple physically contiguous pages.
> This means that bvec_iter_advance() can move to a different page while
> staying in the same bvec (i.e. ->bi_bvec_done != 0).
>
> The messenger works in terms of segments which can now be defined as
> the smaller of a bvec and a page.  The "more bytes to process in this
> segment" condition holds only if bvec_iter_advance() leaves us in the
> same bvec _and_ in the same page.  On next bvec (possibly in the same
> page) and on next page (possibly in the same bvec) we may need to set
> ->last_piece.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin (Microsoft) <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
>  net/ceph/messenger.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> index 7e71b0df1fbc..3083988ce729 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> @@ -840,6 +840,7 @@ static bool ceph_msg_data_bio_advance(struct ceph_msg_data_cursor *cursor,
>                                         size_t bytes)
>  {
>         struct ceph_bio_iter *it = &cursor->bio_iter;
> +       struct page *page = bio_iter_page(it->bio, it->iter);
>
>         BUG_ON(bytes > cursor->resid);
>         BUG_ON(bytes > bio_iter_len(it->bio, it->iter));
> @@ -851,7 +852,8 @@ static bool ceph_msg_data_bio_advance(struct ceph_msg_data_cursor *cursor,
>                 return false;   /* no more data */
>         }
>
> -       if (!bytes || (it->iter.bi_size && it->iter.bi_bvec_done))
> +       if (!bytes || (it->iter.bi_size && it->iter.bi_bvec_done &&
> +                      page == bio_iter_page(it->bio, it->iter)))
>                 return false;   /* more bytes to process in this segment */
>
>         if (!it->iter.bi_size) {
> @@ -899,6 +901,7 @@ static bool ceph_msg_data_bvecs_advance(struct ceph_msg_data_cursor *cursor,
>                                         size_t bytes)
>  {
>         struct bio_vec *bvecs = cursor->data->bvec_pos.bvecs;
> +       struct page *page = bvec_iter_page(bvecs, cursor->bvec_iter);
>
>         BUG_ON(bytes > cursor->resid);
>         BUG_ON(bytes > bvec_iter_len(bvecs, cursor->bvec_iter));
> @@ -910,7 +913,8 @@ static bool ceph_msg_data_bvecs_advance(struct ceph_msg_data_cursor *cursor,
>                 return false;   /* no more data */
>         }
>
> -       if (!bytes || cursor->bvec_iter.bi_bvec_done)
> +       if (!bytes || (cursor->bvec_iter.bi_bvec_done &&
> +                      page == bvec_iter_page(bvecs, cursor->bvec_iter)))
>                 return false;   /* more bytes to process in this segment */
>
>         BUG_ON(cursor->last_piece);

Same here, shouldn't be needed.

Thanks,

                Ilya

Powered by blists - more mailing lists