lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:15:43 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <>
To:     Miroslav Lichvar <>
Cc:     Richard Cochran <>,
        Jiri Benc <>,,
        David Miller <>,
        Patrick McHardy <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] macvlan: pass get_ts_info and SIOC[SG]HWTSTAMP
 ioctl to real device

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:31:41AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:18:17PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:05:09AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > > select a more general filter. A container could run a PTP clock if it
> > 
> > Do you have an idea about how to select a general filter? If we have enabled
> > HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_SYNC on host and a user in container want to enable
> > HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_DELAY_REQ, then which one is more general?
> In this case neither is a more general filter of the other. If

Yes, that what I mean, some times it's hard to say which one is more general.
like PTP_V2_L4_EVENT and PTP_V2_L2_SYNC.

> V2_L4_SYNC is already selected, only the following filters could be
> selected on the macvlan interface:
> I think one way to check this would be to assign each filter a
> (16-bit?) value where the individual bits correspond to the message
> types and the newly selected filter would have to contain all bits of
> the old one.

Just like I said, how to compare with different types.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists