[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190425134006.GG18865@dhcp-12-139.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:40:06 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
stefan.sorensen@...ctralink.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] macvlan: pass get_ts_info and SIOC[SG]HWTSTAMP
ioctl to real device
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:32:13AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> If those values I described above were in an array called ts_map
> indexed by the RX filter enum, I think the check could just be:
>
> (ts_map[old_filter] & ts_map[new_filter]) == tsmap[old_filter]
>
> The individual bits would correspond to:
>
> PTP_V1_L4_SYNC
> PTP_V1_L4_DELAY_REQ
> PTP_V2_L4_SYNC
> PTP_V2_L4_DELAY_REQ
> PTP_V2_L2_SYNC
> PTP_V2_L2_DELAY_REQ
> NTP_ALL
>
> And the remaining RX filters would be combinations of those.
>
> --
Hi Miroslav, Richard,
Here is a draft patch with your idea. I haven't test it and it may has some
issues. But the logic should looks like what you said. The copy_from/to_user
is a little ugly, but I haven't come up with a more gentle way.
Would you please help have a look at it and see which way we should use?
Drop SIOCSHWTSTAMP in container or add a filter on macvlan(maybe only in
container)?
Thanks
Hangbin
diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
index 4a6be8fab884..0f87a42fc61c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
@@ -824,18 +824,75 @@ static int macvlan_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
return 0;
}
+int check_rx_filter(unsigned int new_filter, unsigned int old_filter)
+{
+ u8 ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NTP_ALL];
+
+ memset(ts_map, 0, sizeof(ts_map));
+
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_SYNC - 1] = 0x01;
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_DELAY_REQ - 1] = 0x02;
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT - 1] = 0x03;
+
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_SYNC - 1] = 0x11;
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_DELAY_REQ - 1] = 0x12;
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_EVENT - 1] = 0x13;
+
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_SYNC - 1] = 0x31;
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_DELAY_REQ - 1] = 0x32;
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT - 1] = 0x33;
+
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NTP_ALL - 1] = 0xF0;
+ ts_map[HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL - 1] = 0xFF;
+
+ if ((ts_map[new_filter] & ts_map[old_filter]) == ts_map[old_filter])
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return -EACCES;
+}
+
static int macvlan_do_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
{
struct net_device *real_dev = macvlan_dev_real_dev(dev);
const struct net_device_ops *ops = real_dev->netdev_ops;
- struct ifreq ifrr;
+ unsigned int old_filter, new_filter, new_tx_type;
+ struct hwtstamp_config new_stmpconf, old_stmpconf;
int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ struct ifreq ifrr;
+
+ /* Get new rx_filter */
+ if (copy_from_user(&new_stmpconf, ifr->ifr_data, sizeof(new_stmpconf))) {
+ return -EFAULT;
+ } else {
+ new_tx_type = new_stmpconf.tx_type;
+ new_filter = new_stmpconf.rx_filter;
+ }
+ /* Get old rx_filter */
strncpy(ifrr.ifr_name, real_dev->name, IFNAMSIZ);
ifrr.ifr_ifru = ifr->ifr_ifru;
+ if (netif_device_present(real_dev) && ops->ndo_do_ioctl)
+ err = ops->ndo_do_ioctl(real_dev, &ifrr, SIOCGHWTSTAMP);
+
+ if (!err && copy_from_user(&old_stmpconf, ifrr.ifr_data, sizeof(old_stmpconf)))
+ old_filter = old_stmpconf.rx_filter;
+ else
+ return err;
+
+ /* Copy new data back */
+ if (copy_to_user(ifrr.ifr_data, &new_stmpconf, sizeof(new_stmpconf)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
switch (cmd) {
case SIOCSHWTSTAMP:
+ if (new_tx_type != HWTSTAMP_TX_ON ||
+ new_filter == HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME)
+ return err;
+
+ err = check_rx_filter(new_filter, old_filter);
+ if (err)
+ break;
case SIOCGHWTSTAMP:
if (netif_device_present(real_dev) && ops->ndo_do_ioctl)
err = ops->ndo_do_ioctl(real_dev, &ifrr, cmd);
--
2.19.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists