[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bza3CMqp5pqtkEFh+3GAHcH+qcKYJhbL02jbauWjD_K0Xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:34:34 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf-next PATCH] bpf: sockmap, test tool support to skip cgroup arg
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:19 AM John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Its handy to not have to setup a cgroup environment when running
> test_sockmap with user specified options. This patch setups a cgroup
> environment, similar to how it is done with the auto test suite, when
> the user does not provide a cgroup arg.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
> index 3845144e2c91..11dfb1f10e15 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
> @@ -1734,6 +1734,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> int opt, longindex, err, cg_fd = 0;
> char *bpf_file = BPF_SOCKMAP_FILENAME;
> int test = PING_PONG;
> + bool cleanup = true;
>
> if (argc < 2)
> return test_suite(-1);
> @@ -1773,6 +1774,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> cg_fd, optarg);
> return cg_fd;
> }
> + cleanup = false;
> break;
> case 'r':
> rate = atoi(optarg);
> @@ -1818,9 +1820,23 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
Code one line above this, assumes that tool in non-test mode always
has argc > 3. With --cgroup being optional, that's not true anymore,
right? Or am I missing how it's supposed to be used?
> return test_suite(cg_fd);
>
> if (!cg_fd) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "%s requires cgroup option: --cgroup <path>\n",
> - argv[0]);
Now that --cgroup is optional, would it make sense to update usage
function at line 121 to remove "--cgroup <cgroup_path>"?
> - return -1;
> + if (setup_cgroup_environment()) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: cgroup env failed\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + cg_fd = create_and_get_cgroup(CG_PATH);
> + if (cg_fd < 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr,
> + "ERROR: (%i) open cg path failed: %s\n",
> + cg_fd, optarg);
> + return cg_fd;
> + }
> +
> + if (join_cgroup(CG_PATH)) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: failed to join cgroup\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> err = populate_progs(bpf_file);
> @@ -1839,6 +1855,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> options.rate = rate;
>
> err = run_options(&options, cg_fd, test);
> + if (cleanup)
> + cleanup_cgroup_environment();
> close(cg_fd);
> return err;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists