[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190425002140.208523-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:21:40 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tipc: remove rcu_read_unlock() left in tipc_udp_recv()
I forgot to remove one rcu_read_unlock() before a return statement.
Joy of mixing goto and return styles in a function :)
Fixes: 4109a2c3b91e ("tipc: tipc_udp_recv() cleanup vs rcu verbs")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
net/tipc/udp_media.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/udp_media.c b/net/tipc/udp_media.c
index 7413cbc9b638af492d6a592df957a3229fa6a3fa..0884a1b8ad12595cabca71229789c55a14f24659 100644
--- a/net/tipc/udp_media.c
+++ b/net/tipc/udp_media.c
@@ -360,7 +360,6 @@ static int tipc_udp_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (b && test_bit(0, &b->up)) {
tipc_rcv(sock_net(sk), skb, b);
- rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
--
2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists