lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <437c77d4-99a8-5350-3bd8-c9a44d5c18b6@embeddedor.com> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:45:54 -0500 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: arnd@...db.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: socket: Fix missing break in switch statement On 4/26/19 10:29 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:31:24 -0500 > >> Add missing break statement in order to prevent the code from falling >> through to cases SIOCGSTAMP_NEW and SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW. >> >> This bug was found thanks to the ongoing efforts to enable >> -Wimplicit-fallthrough. >> >> Fixes: 0768e17073dc ("net: socket: implement 64-bit timestamps") >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com> > > Applied. > Great. :) Thanks, Dave. -- Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists