lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 26 Apr 2019 23:10:33 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Igor Russkikh <Igor.Russkikh@...antia.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nikita Danilov <Nikita.Danilov@...antia.com>,
        Dmitry Bogdanov <Dmitry.Bogdanov@...antia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 04/15] net: aquantia: link interrupt handling
 function

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:47:47AM +0000, Igor Russkikh wrote:
> Define link interrupt handler
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Danilov <ndanilov@...antia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@...antia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
> index 059df86e8e37..4851fc0a3ae5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
> @@ -161,6 +161,20 @@ static int aq_nic_update_link_status(struct aq_nic_s *self)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static irqreturn_t aq_linkstate_threaded_isr(int irq, void *private)
> +{
> +	struct aq_nic_s *self = private;
> +
> +	if (!self)
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> +	aq_nic_update_link_status(self);
> +
> +	self->aq_hw_ops->hw_irq_enable(self->aq_hw,
> +				       BIT(self->aq_nic_cfg.link_irq_vec));

So does this mean the hardware disables interrupts when they fire?  Is
this an ack, not an enable?

Can you loose interrupts this way? Or are the internally level
interrupts, so it could immediately fire again if the source has not
been services?

Thanks
	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists