[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bcd6aba-ea18-7e20-b883-3b926b9a2c07@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:00:28 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: virtio_net: suspicious RCU usage with xdp
On 2019/4/26 上午1:41, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> It does sound like my commit 5d053f9da431 ("bpf: devmap prepare xdp
> frames for bulking") introduced this issue. I guess we can add the RCU
> section to xdp_do_flush_map(), and then also verify that the devmap
> (and cpumap) take-down code also have appropriate RCU sections (which
> they should have).
>
> Another requirement for calling .ndo_xdp_xmit is running under NAPI
> protection,
May I know the reason for this? I'm asking since if the packet was
redirected from tuntap, ndo_xdp_xmit() won't be called under the
protection of NAPI (but bh is disabled).
Thanks
> is that still satisifed for veth?
> (even when invoked via xdp_do_flush_map()).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists