netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: phy: realtek: Add rtl8211e rx/tx delays config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 28 Apr 2019 22:19:05 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...latforms.ru>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: phy: realtek: Add rtl8211e rx/tx delays
 config

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 05:21:09PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > >> Hi Serge
> > > >>
> > > >> Next time please include a patch 0 containing a cover note explaining
> > > >> the who series.
> > > >>
> > > > 
> > > > Sure as long as the patchset gets to be much bigger than two small
> > > > patches with an obvious reason to be merged.
> > > 
> > > netdev likes to have a cover letter for patch count >= 1, probably
> > > something to be added to netdev-FAQ.rst.
> > > -- 
> > > Florian
> > 
> > Hello Florian
> > Really, even with count = 1? So just one patch with cover-letter? Doesn't it
> > seem redundant since at least a single patch can be thoroughly described in
> > it' commit message?
> 
> Hi Serge
> 
> David workflow is to put the patch set into a branch, and then merge
> the branch into his master, using the cover note as the merge commit
> message.
> 
> You occasionally see commit messages for count == 1, but not often.
> For > 1, if there is no cover note, somebody is likely to ask for one
> :-)
> 
>     Andrew

Hello Andrew and Florian

Alright. I see your point. Though I am not really agree with it at this
situation, the next version of the mini-patchset will be sent with a
cover-letter as per maintainers request.

Meanwhile lets put aside this discussion and get back to the topic-related
one. Could you respond to the email I've sent in response to the Andrew's
comment on the second patch of v2 duet?

-Sergey