[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190428163705.GH23059@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 18:37:05 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, yt.shen@...iatek.com,
jianguo.zhang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] net: stmmac: add mdio clause 45 access from mac
device for dwmac4
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 02:30:08PM +0800, Biao Huang wrote:
> +static int stmmac_c45_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phyaddr,
> + int devad, int prtad)
> +{
> + struct net_device *ndev = bus->priv;
> + struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + unsigned int mii_address = priv->hw->mii.addr;
> + unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;
> + u32 v, value;
> + int data;
> +
> + if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
> + 100, 10000))
> + return -EBUSY;
Hi Biao
readl_poll_timeout() returns an error code. It is better to return
that, than make up some other error code. Yes, i know the C22 read
returns EBUSY, but we don't need to copy that behaviour into C45.
> +
> + value = 0;
> + value |= (prtad << priv->hw->mii.cl45_reg_shift)
> + & priv->hw->mii.cl45_reg_mask;
> + writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_data);
> +
> + /* delay 2ms to avoid error value of get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg */
> + mdelay(2);
Please could you explain this a bit more?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists