lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-Ji+=AJPCscPdy0wdt1YMr3scwm0skx2V=jk7U6QtRQYw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 09:26:45 -0400 From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] packet: in recvmsg msg_name return at least sockaddr_ll On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:19 AM David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote: > > > Can then also change memset to zero only two bytes in the Ethernet case. > > > > + if (msg->msg_namelen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll)) { > > + msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll); > > + memset(msg->msg_name + copy_len, 0, > > + msg->namelen - copy_len); > > copy_len not defined .... Was a quick sketch of an iteration on the above, sorry if unclear. Intended to be defined before the branch. > > > + } > > Except that has to be a real memset() not an inlined direct > write of an 8byte register (or 2 writes on a 32bit systems). I wasn't sure whether a 2 byte store would be optimized in a similar manner. That might even be architecture dependent, I imagine? Will leave as is. Thanks for the quick response! > > David > > - > Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK > Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists