[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190429083422.4356-11-esben@geanix.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:34:20 +0200
From: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Yang Wei <yang.wei9@....com.cn>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] net: ll_temac: Replace bad usage of msleep() with usleep_range()
Use usleep_range() to avoid problems with msleep() actually sleeping
much longer than expected.
Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c
index 2d50646..5e7b8f0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ int temac_indirect_busywait(struct temac_local *lp)
WARN_ON(1);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
- msleep(1);
+ usleep_range(500, 1000);
}
return 0;
}
--
2.4.11
Powered by blists - more mailing lists