[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2fb8c83-c824-9c61-0660-22c164cde5c7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 21:32:14 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: improve phy_set_sym_pause and
phy_set_asym_pause
On 30.04.2019 07:06, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 29.04.2019 23:52, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> @@ -2078,6 +2089,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(phy_set_sym_pause);
>>> void phy_set_asym_pause(struct phy_device *phydev, bool rx, bool tx)
>>> {
>>> __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(oldadv);
>>> + bool asym_pause_supported;
>>> +
>>> + asym_pause_supported =
>>> + linkmode_test_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT,
>>> + phydev->supported);
>>>
>>> linkmode_copy(oldadv, phydev->advertising);
>>>
>>> @@ -2086,14 +2102,14 @@ void phy_set_asym_pause(struct phy_device *phydev, bool rx, bool tx)
>>> linkmode_clear_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT,
>>> phydev->advertising);
>>>
>>> - if (rx) {
>>> + if (rx && asym_pause_supported) {
>>> linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Pause_BIT,
>>> phydev->advertising);
>>> linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT,
>>> phydev->advertising);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (tx)
>>> + if (tx && asym_pause_supported)
>>> linkmode_change_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT,
>>> phydev->advertising);
>>
>> Hi Heiner
>>
> Hi Andrew,
>
>> If the PHY only supports Pause, not Asym Pause, i wounder if we should
>> fall back to Pause here?
>>
> I wasn't sure about whether a silent fallback is the expected behavior.
> Also open is whether we can rely on a set_pause callback having called
> phy_validate_pause() before. Another option could be to change the
> return type to int and return an error like -EOPNOTSUPP if the requested
> mode isn't supported.
>
Most drivers call phy_validate_pause() first, this seems to be the
expected pattern. Therefore I will remove patch 2. However there seems to
be an error in phy_validate_pause(), the fix I will submit separately.
>> Andrew
>>
> Heiner
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists