[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190501.171844.1878018144020092178.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 17:18:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kafai@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com, bsd@...com,
kernel-team@...com, weiwan@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: A few fixes on dereferencing rt->from
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:45:12 -0700
> It is a followup after the fix in
> commit 9c69a1320515 ("route: Avoid crash from dereferencing NULL rt->from")
>
> rt6_do_redirect():
> 1. NULL checking is needed on rt->from because a parallel
> fib6_info delete could happen that sets rt->from to NULL.
> (e.g. rt6_remove_exception() and fib6_drop_pcpu_from()).
>
> 2. fib6_info_hold() is not enough. Same reason as (1).
> Meaning, holding dst->__refcnt cannot ensure
> rt->from is not NULL or rt->from->fib6_ref is not 0.
>
> Instead of using fib6_info_hold_safe() which ip6_rt_cache_alloc()
> is already doing, this patch chooses to extend the rcu section
> to keep "from" dereference-able after checking for NULL.
>
> inet6_rtm_getroute():
> 1. NULL checking is also needed on rt->from for a similar reason.
> Note that inet6_rtm_getroute() is using RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED.
>
> Fixes: a68886a69180 ("net/ipv6: Make from in rt6_info rcu protected")
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists