netdev - Re: Handling of EPROBE_DEFER in of_get_mac_address [Was: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] net: macb: Drop nvmem_get_mac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190501135417.GB19809@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 1 May 2019 15:54:17 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...e.cz>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: Handling of EPROBE_DEFER in of_get_mac_address [Was: Re: [PATCH
 v2 3/4] net: macb: Drop nvmem_get_mac_address usage]

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:13:35PM +0200, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> [2019-04-29 15:02:48]:
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> > > My understanding of -PROBE_DEFER is, that it needs to be propagated back from
> > > the driver's probe callback/hook to the upper device/driver subsystem in order
> > > to be moved to the list of pending drivers and considered for probe later
> > > again. This is not going to happen in any of the current drivers, thus it will
> > > probably still always result in random MAC address in case of -EPROBE_DEFER
> > > error from the nvmem subsystem.
> > 
> > All current drivers which don't look in NVMEM don't expect
> > EPROBE_DEFER. 
> 
> once there's NVMEM wired in of_get_mac_address, one can simply use it, nothing
> is going to stop the potential user of doing so and if EPROBE_DEFER isn't
> propagated from the driver back to the upper device driver subsytem, it's
> probably going to end with random MAC address in some (very rare?) cases.

Hi Petr

There is no simple answer here. If we add EPROBE_DEFER support to all
the current drivers using of_get_mac_address(), we are likely to break
something. Regressions are bad. If somebody does add NVMEM properties
to a device which does not currently have them, and it fails, that it
just bad testing, not a regressions.

So i would keep it KISS. Allow of_get_mac_address() to return an
error, but don't modify current drivers to look for it.

       Andrew