lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190502061800.GL7676@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 May 2019 09:18:00 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net-next][PATCH v2 2/2] rds: add sysctl for rds support of
 On-Demand-Paging

On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:54:50AM -0700, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On 5/1/2019 12:45 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:37:20PM -0700, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > > RDS doesn't support RDMA on memory apertures that require On Demand
> > > Paging (ODP), such as FS DAX memory. A sysctl is added to indicate
> > > whether RDMA requiring ODP is supported.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: HÃ¥kon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
> > > Reviewed-tested-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Westgaard Ry <hans.westgaard.ry@...cle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
> > > ---
> > >   net/rds/ib.h        | 1 +
> > >   net/rds/ib_sysctl.c | 8 ++++++++
> > >   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > This sysctl is not needed at all
> >
> Its needed for application to check the support of the ODP support
> feature which in progress. Failing the RDS_GET_MR was just one path
> and we also support inline MR registration along with message request.
>
> Basically application runs on different kernel versions and to be
> portable, it will check if underneath RDS support ODP and then only
> use RDMA. If not it will fallback to buffer copy mode. Hope
> it clarifies.

Using ODP sysctl to determine if to use RDMA or not, looks like very
problematic approach. How old applications will work in such case
without knowledge of such sysctl?
How new applications will distinguish between ODP is not supported, but
RDMA works?

Thanks

>
>
> Regards,
> Santosh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ